Thursday, January 19, 2012

exam part 3



            In Metamorphoses, by Franz Kafka Gregor Samsa is outnumbered and overpowered by the forces surrounding him. He starts off in a family friendly environment. He has two parents whom he supports by working hard and he has a sister whom he deeply cares about and she reciprocates those feelings. Gregor works for the sole purpose of providing for his family because they are incapable of taking care of themselves. He undergoes huge changes one night and his family goes from respecting him to fearing and lamenting the new person he has become. Gregor is mistreated by his family and even his beloved sister begins to show hate and regret and that is when Gregor becomes a by-product of his environment. He becomes depressed and uncomfortable, he feels abandoned so he unintentionally starts to cause trouble. The family invites borders to live with them and pay rent in order to maintain their fiancés, but instead of staying out of sight Gregor is attracted to the music his sister produces and reveals himself. He is physically hurt by his father and shunned by his sister.

The stress his family bestowed upon him from the beginning and their poor sense of sensitivity and understanding forces Gregor to feel isolated. His one priority was providing for his family and sending his sister to further her education and the very things he worked for have turned on him. He chooses not to eat and becomes malnourished, this suggest how bad it is for Gregor living in his house. The interior world that Gregor held so dearly was destroyed by his family which in hindsight was his environment.

exam essay part 2

In “The Stranger” by Albert Camus, I see the main character Meursault to be immoral. He is utterly emotionless to the events that are happening around him. He catches wind of his mother’s death and as her only child he does not feel any form of grief or sadness. Meursault does not feel self-conscious of how the other people at the funeral are bashing his name. After his mother’s death we learn that Meursault does not have anything of value nor does he hold any values. He is content with doing the same thing every day and is actually afraid of change when his supervisor offers to transfer him to Paris. The Paris promotion could serve as a turning point in his life but just like everything else he disregards it and does not establish a stance on how he feels about it. The lack of opinion urges me to sympathize more with him because it seems like he is missing out on life. Life is all about choices and the reasons why we make them, but Meursault refuses to make any choices. The one person who may hold any real significance to him is ignored. Meursault goes out on dates with a woman named Maria and her feelings grow like they naturally should. Maria say, “Hey do you love me?” and Meursault replies with “I don’t know.” He is incapable of describing her personality to the reader but he shows happiness when he describes her physical features. I feel sympathetic towards him because when a man uses a woman for her body and ignores her feelings that are frowned upon, but Meursault does not do that on purpose he truly cannot help it. He takes pride in describing her beautiful tan skin and luscious breast but he cannot make a single comment on how he feels about her personality.

            Meursault is imprisoned but he does not suffer from the worries you would expect him to, for example never seeing Maria again, losing his job, and surrendering his life and reputation. He only thinks about his cigarettes, sex, and nature itself. The pitiful aspect is that he stops caring about those things and everything else in general and fines a home or a sense of comfortableness in a prison cell.

AP exam essay part 1

“Sonnet 30” by Edmund Spencer, the speaker is infatuated with something he can never harmonize with. In “Bright Star, Would I were Steadfast as Thou Art” by John Keats, the speaker is also attracted to an entity that baffles him and he to tries to understand it. The speaker in “Sonnet 30” is the element of fire while his lover represents ice. He continually tries to melt her icy, cold demeanor through his actions but results in failure each time. The speaker constantly questions himself about why he is pursuing this opposite entity, but at no point does he give up. He wonders why he is own desire for her is not discouraged because of her behavior towards him. Instead, her repeating rejections make his fire burn brighter which increases his love for her. The speaker realizes that his fire is hardening the ice as well and concludes that no force can oppose love, not even utter opposites.

            The speaker in “Bright Star” is not trying to understand a woman, but a star. The star is millions of light years away but the speaker envies it and longs to exhibit its nature and status He wants to live his life observing humanity in a passive superior perspective. Conflict arises when he realized that being a star means being immortal; he will be forced to leave his lover behind to die by herself. The common qualities of romanticism that these poems share are the expression of love and how both speakers desire things that should be out of their reach. In “Sonnet 30” the speaker goes against all odds and reality to be with his lover, in “Bright Star” the speaker deeply loves a specific way of life, never moving and unchanging, but his love for his girlfriend exceeds all.

             

Friday, January 6, 2012

A.P. exam 3 essay

In Richard II by William Shakespeare, the queen hears a plethora of statements made by two commoners about her king. They describe the king’s decline in power and desire change, specifically equality. In the gardener’s first paragraph he says, “Give some supportance to the bending twigs,” and “Go thou, and like an executioner, cut off the heads of too fast growing sprays. All government must be equal.” The gardener demands support for the people that are bending over backwards for their king and are receiving nothing, and the wealthy that are depriving other commoners like him must be rooted away because they are “Sucking the land’s fertility from wholesome flowers.” The gardener and servant use weeds to describe blemishes in their kingdom just like how they blemish and taint a garden. The best points of society are being killed by these weeds because the king refuses to maintain his kingdom. The servant says “The whole land is full of weeds, her fairest flowers chocked up,” and “Her fruit tress all unpruned, her hedges ruined, her knots disordered and her wholesome herbs swarming with caterpillars.” The king’s laziness is costing him his country’s beauty.

            The gardener continues to ridicule the king for not maintaining his land. He relates running a kingdom to trimming and dressing a garden; the king neglected to take care of anyone from the beginning so now he can never “taste their fruits of duty.” What is a king without loyal subjects? He is no one and that is why his status as king is jeopardy. He will most likely be deposed for disregarding the weeds in his garden.